I think that it is far easier to care about memory’s safety on the fewer levels possible. That’s 2 examples but I believe that 1Password may do it also. Keepass can do it with some plugins/extension. I legitimately like BitWarden and simply want to see it’s abilities mature.Ī great thing will be to change extensions working scheme or add new kind of extensions that could works this way: instead of opening the vault with the browser’s extension, the main desktop’s application (for example: Bitwarden’s Windows desktop’s application) take care of the vault management and opens a communication’s channel with the browser’s extension that just take care of things like forms filling and saving new entries. I meant this to be respectful, and not a bash on the program. I find them to be that much of a standard option/ability I can get from Enpass, Lastpass, Dashlane, or any others. To the point that even though I bought premium, I am considering moving back to Enpass until these get addressed. These are legitimate issues I have for fully embracing your software at the moment. Avoiding having to enter that log tough password every time. I added a Yubikey in hopes that I could simply authenticate with bitwarden using my physical key. It’s quite simple, and facilitates integration between the app and the extension.įurther, I have to input my full master password each time I do this. I can open the app and work within it, etc, then if I visit a website that needs a login, it checks if I have the App open and authenticated. There is no check to see I’m already authenticated in the official app.Įnpass, for example, allows this. I have to log in AGAIN, within the browser. I find it counterintuitive and frustrating however, that if I am logged in using the BitWarden application on the PC, when opening a browser and trying to login to say, Gmail, it does not recognize that I am logged into that vault in the app. I’m a new BitWarden user and I have to say, I really like it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |